I started posting on HowieinSeattle in 11/04, following progressive American politics in the spirit of Howard Dean's effort to "Take Our Country Back." I decided to follow my heart and posted on seattleforbarackobama from 2/07 to 11/08.--"Howie Martin is the Abe Linkin' of progressive Seattle."--Michael Hood.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
"How the Supreme Court's Healthcare Ruling Boosts Obama's Reelection Bid"
"It's constitutional. Bitches." —Patrick Gaspard, Executive Director, DNCObamacare lives. And, with it, Barack Obama's case for a second term.
In laying the groundwork for 2012, Obama and Mitt Romney have had dueling imperatives: The president needs to make sure that the November election is a choice. Romney needs to make it an up-or-down referendum.
In Team Obama's frame, choosing to reelect the president is a vote to continue moving "Forward"; choosing Romney is a vote to return to the policies that created our current pain.
That frame only works, however, if you can demonstrate that you're, in fact, creating forward progress that's easing the pain. And June has been a hazardous month for that narrative. The nation's slow, steady economic recovery appeared to stall out. Job growth flatlined. Then Obama gaffed, calling the private sector's stagnating performance "fine."
The June gloom played right into Team Romney's frame: "Obama isn't working." The president hasn't delivered. You need to vote him out of office (by, oh yeah, voting for me.) The upshot of this referendum model is that you don't even have to like Romney, just so long as you want to oust Obama.
Now, imagine for a moment that the president's signature legislative accomplishment had gone down the tubes this morning, with Chief Justice John Roberts joining the dissenters in finding the Affordable Care Act "invalid in its entirety."
The Romney camp could have rightly blasted Obama for two years of wasted effort. MORE...
H/t to Ari Berman.
"Obamacare Upheld: How and Why Did Justice Roberts Do It?"
David Cole (The Nation): So why did Roberts do it? In part, the outcome reflects the fact that the truly radical position in this dispute was that of the challengers. Even very conservative lower court judges, including Jeffrey Sutton of the Sixth Circuit and Laurence Silberman of the DC Circuit, had concluded that the law was valid (although on Commerce Clause, not taxing power, grounds). But in addition, I cannot help but think that at the back of Roberts’ mind was the Court’s institutional standing. Had the law been struck down on “party lines,” the Court’s reputation would be seriously undermined. In May, the Pew Research Center reported that favorable views of the Supreme Court as an institution had reached an all-time low. Sharply divided partisan decisions like Bush v. Gore and Citizens United appear to have done damage to the Court’s legitimacy—and ultimately, its legitimacy is the source of the Court’s power. Today’s result, which upholds the actions of the democratically elected branches on a major piece of social welfare legislation that affects us all against a challenge that was always a real long shot, driven more by politics than legal principle, may help repair the Court’s tarnished image. MORE...
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
WA: "Rally in Response to the Supreme Court’s Health Care Decision"
Washington Community Action Network:Attend a rapid response event near you!This Thursday, the US Supreme Court is expected to rule on Rob McKenna’s partisan challenge to the Affordable Care Act - President Obama’s health care reform law. It’s perhaps the most anticipated Supreme Court ruling in our nation’s history.
Regardless of the outcome, we’ll be ready. Please RSVP on Washington Community Action Network's web site.
Thursday, June 28 outside the Attorney General's offices around the state
SEATTLE - 2pm
800 Fifth AvenueSPOKANE - noon
1116 W Riverside AvenuePORT ANGELES - 4pm
115 E RailroadTACOMA - 4pm
1250 Pacific AvenueTRI-CITIES - 1pm
8127 W. Klamath Court, KennewickBELLINGHAM - noon
103 E Holly StWENATCHEE - noon
18 S Mission StEVERETT - 10am
3501 Colby AvenueOLYMPIA - 12:15pm
1125 Washington St SEYAKIMA - noon
1433 Lakeside Court
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
"How Badly Will SCOTUS Screw Up Obamacare?" (Updated)
"Uninsured patients receiving care at a free clinic."Jonathan Chait:
The Supreme Court is likely to announce soon if it has decided to declare the individual mandate unconstitutional. (Which is to say, it’s announcing whether Anthony Kennedy hates health care reform a lot or only a little, because everybody assumes the other four Republican justices hate it so much they’ll declare it unconstitutional.)Howie P.S.:As you can tell, I’m already bitter about this, as the constitutionality of the individual mandate is so obvious that the mere fact that the controversy exists suggests a frightening will to power by the legal arm of the conservative movement. But, as we consider the possible outcomes, it’s worth keeping in mind something that is not likely to come through in the news coverage: The vast majority of the bill is likely to stay in place. MORE...
Pithy quotes from Chait-Howie P.P.S.: Public Option Advocates To Push Medicare For All If Supreme Court Strikes ‘Obamacare.’
"Conservatives tend toward triumphalism, liberals tend toward despair, and the news media tends to overplay the importance of whatever thing just happened."
"If the Court strikes down the mandate, I will lose my shit. But striking the mandate would not end the law, or even most of the law."