"Chuck Todd's Interview with David Axelrod Oct. 26" (with video)

Today with President Obama with video from MSNBC, (10:19):

David Axelrod says Obama didn't endorse anyone in Rhode Island out of respect for Lincoln Chafee. In response to a NYT story that said a republican-controlled Congress would make a good foil for Obama, Axelrod says Obama doesn't need a foil.
Axelrod also answers David Brooks' recent column in which Brooks said the Obama administration spends too much time blaming the republicans. I don't think Obama would be pointing out the republicans if he wasn't always being blamed for their mess. Ironically, the people that created the recession are going to be put back in power because people lack a basic understanding of what happened to the economy.

Todd: "President hears from voters, seems more reflective" (video)

MSNBC; Chuck Todd on the Morning Jokesters (and Terry Terry McAuliffe), video (05:48).:

Ari Melber with Chuck Todd on MSNBC on OFA (video)

MSNBC, video (03:44).

Howie P.S.: Ari gets wall-to-wall coverage here because he grew up in Seattle, and still comes back to visit his parents.

ED Show: "Midterm elections are a turnout game" (video)

MSNBC-ED Show, video (12:37).

Howie P.S.: Harold Schaitberger of the Int. Association of Firefighters and Chuck Todd of NBC News talk with ED about the health care sausage-making in DC.

"Chuck Todd And Glenn Greenwald Debate Torture And The Media" (with audio/text)

Glenn Greenwald, with audio/text):

(click above for audio)

Yesterday, I voiced several criticisms of comments made earlier this week by NBC News Political Director Chuck Todd regarding potential torture investigations by the Obama Justice Department. Shortly thereafter, he emailed me to say that he wished I had contacted him before posting. In response, I invited him to participate in a podcast discussion with me of the issues raised by his remarks and my analysis of them, and, to his credit, he accepted.

This morning, I spoke with Todd for roughly 30 minutes about the relative significance of torture investigations, the implications of failing to prosecute high-level political officials when they break the law, the role of the media in these matters, and whether Todd was expressing his own views or merely repeating what the White House believes (the polling data I reference, along with the media's routine distortion of it, is documented here and here). The discussion can be heard by clicking PLAY on the recorder below (it can be also downloaded by MP3 here or by ITunes here). A transcript will be posted later today.

UPDATE: The transcript is now available here.

Howie P.S.: Go to the Greenwald link at the top for the audio.

Chuck Todd: "It's Barack Obama's town" (video)

MSNBC-Morning Joe, video (06:24);

Howie P.S.: The latest poop from inside the Beltway.

Barack Obama

Chuck Todd: Why did Obama change his position on the interrogation issue? (video)

MSNBC-NBC Nightly News, video (01:14).

Barack Obama

"Obama Cuba move marks big change in policy" (video)

MSNBC-Morning Joe, video (11:33).

Howie P.S.: Chuck Todd and Eugene Robinson (minus Joe) discuss the style and substance of the Cuba issue before moving on to the state of the economy. Regarding Cuba, I think this is an example of Obama's thoughtful (cautious), incremental theory of change.

Barack Obama

In defense of Chuck Todd (with video)

Politico, video (01:04).

Howie P.S.: Todd has been getting hammered all day about his question at the press conference about "shared sacrifice." Obama chose to turn the question towards "Main Street" even though I think Todd was talking about "Wall Street":

Some of your programs have actually cushioned the blow for those that were irresponsible...

Granted, Todd wasn't perfectly clear about the group he was targeting, but I don't see how you can conclude that it wasn't the gamblers in banking and insurance.

Barack Obama

"NBC's Chuck Todd Gathers Citizen Questions for Obama Presser"

Ari Melber (The Nation):

In another example of traditional journalists experimenting with participatory media, Chuck Todd, NBC's White House Correspondent, is gathering questions from citizens in preparation for Tuesday's prime time press conference with President Barack Obama.

Todd is soliciting question ideas from blog commenters, both through Newsvine.com and a plug on MSNBC's First Read, and he will also look over some of the top questions voted by citizens at Ask The President, (which I just launched in a partnership with The Nation, PDF and The Washington Times).

Addressing Newsvine readers, Todd explained:

I'd like question ideas from you for the president next Tuesday night... But I don't necessarily want the question ideas DIRECTLY from you, I want to hear what your neighbors and less politics-obsessed friends and family want asked... I know every reporter claims they are listening to you and I'm not going to promise that I'm going to use a direct question but I do view these prime time press conferences as vehicles for the public...

In response to Ask The President, which enables a more accountable process for transparent voting and question submission by video and text, Todd emailed me asking us to "send ideas" his way. "I'm soliciting question ideas from a wide variety of sources and do want to ask a 'kitchen table' question on Tuesday," he added.

To be crystal clear, neither Todd nor NBC have signed up as formal partners with Ask The President. (Our coalition now spans newspapers, magazines, blogs, non-partisan organizations and large membership groups, but still no television outlets.) And as Todd stressed to his readers, he is not promising to use a citizen question on Tuesday. USA Today also solicited questions for Obama from readers on Monday, though there is no suggestion that the exercise will inform the paper's contact with the White House.

Simply opening up the public discussion of how the media questions the President, however, already helps advance more accountability and transparency in media-government relations. In my new article on The People's Press Conference, I argue that even if the press does not initially rush to use citizen questions, these public discussions can demonstrate "trends, input and ideas to guide journalists on an ongoing basis." And while it is a fine gesture for journalists to casually invite reader questions, as Todd and ABC's Jake Tapper have recently done via blogs and Twitter, we have the platforms to engage much broader, deeper participation:

Some Washington reporters have begun informally soliciting a wider range of questions for their work... David Gregory, host of NBC's Meet the Press, and Jake Tapper, ABC's senior White House correspondent, are experimenting with the micromessage site Twitter to gather input for their interviews with government officials. On March 3 Tapper tapped a bulletin to his Twitter network, in the informal style common on the site, inviting questions for the daily briefings: "didnt get to it today but consider this a standing invite for good q suggestions for gibbs."

These forays are positive, if they reflect a genuine receptivity to deeper citizen input in journalism and government accountability. Yet they offer no reliable metrics for pooling or assessing public priorities. They are not transparent, either, since there is no unified structure displaying how many people drafted questions, or what other citizens think of them, or whether a reporter's selected questions are representative of those submitted. As a largely one-way circuit, such efforts are less likely to foster public debate or spark sustained citizen participation.

I think using open submission and voting platforms -- as President-elect Obama did during the transition, but not since -- is superior:

Few traditional mechanisms, however, capture the public's active interests--empowering people to draft their own ideas, concerns and questions from scratch. Generating and debating new questions is fundamentally different from picking among a scripted menu ... And virtually no traditional media mechanisms couple that original, individual production with transparent, national voting. Doing both can broaden the issues under public discussion while weighting their priority according to public input--a useful service for our body politic.

We don't know if the press or the White House will begin opening up this week, but if the public keeps pressing, it should only be a matter of time.

To submit and vote on potential questions for President Obama through our project, which has already gathered over 28,000 votes in five days, visit Ask The President now.

To learn more about the project, check out these articles from The Nation and The Washington Times.

To read a response to some input and criticism of the project, see this blog comment.

Howie P.S.: I was a Chuck Todd fan before this, but this is way cool.
Barack Obama

"Chuck, Yer Killin' Me" (with video)

Josh Marshall, with video:

We're sitting here watching Robert Gibbs' White House briefing. And there is a long string of questions about whether Obama can really working in a bipartisan manner if no Republicans are saying nice things about the stimulus bill or voting for the mark-ups out of committee. And Chuck Todd just asked whether Obama would veto

a stimulus bill that came to his desk that hadn't gotten Republican support.

That would be quite a moment.

Late Update: Obama himself appears to have a pretty succinct response.

Barack Obama