Monday, September 13, 2010

GRITtv: Melissa Harris-Lacewell: "Countering Election Spin" (video)


lauraflanders, video (09:48):
"We need to be covering the left as much as we cover, with anxiety, the right," notes Nation contributor and Princeton professor Melissa Harris-Lacewell. The lack of coverage of progressive movements, protests, and actions in the face of a loud, angry and well-funded right wing can be disheartening, but we know they are out there, and in some cases fighting hard to keep a Tea Party backed Republican party from taking back seats in Congress ding the midterms.

Melissa joins us in studio to discuss the upcoming elections, the media message, and what progressives can do to fight back.

Politico: "Midterm Bieber Fever" (with video)


Politico with video (01:16):
Internet-savvy types know that teen heartthrob Justin Bieber pretty much rules the web. Just last week, rumor spread that Bieber’s fan base was so active on Twitter that the microblogging website has servers dedicated just to him. Twitter didn’t confirm, but they didn’t deny it, either.

The takeaway? If you're trying to get a message to go viral, your success rate will surely be higher if you can somehow tie-in the Biebs.

So that’s just what Campus Progress, the college spinoff of the Center for American Progress, decided to do to get people to vote in the midterms.

The organization is highlighting a submission to its VoteAgain2010 video contest that argues, while Bieber can't vote in our midterms (he's both too young and too Canadian), shouldn't you?

"This isn't your standard election year video of celebrities asking you to vote," the ad says. "It's us, asking you to vote for celebrities who can't, celebrities like Justin Bieber. Bieber's too young to vote, yet whomever we elect in the 2010 midterm elections will impact his future and ours. ... So tell your parents, your grandparents, your Facebook friends ... If they won't do it for you, ask them to do it for Bieber." MORE...
Howie P.S.: Coincidentally, here's a report on "Justin Bieber`s `crush` on Michelle Obama." If we can't expect our political institutions to produce big "change," does working on the outside cultural forces offer any "hope"? Or are they just as limited by the bigger powers in charge?

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Geithner to Congress: Don't Wimp Out Now

Wall Street Journal:
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Washington is at risk of undercutting an already sluggish economic recovery if it fails to provide quick, additional support to business and individuals.

Mr. Geithner said the biggest challenge facing the economy right now was Washington paralysis. He urged Congress to take up the White House's recent proposals to give tax incentives to business and fund new infrastructure projects.

"If the government does nothing going forward, then the impact of policy in Washington will shift from supporting economic growth to hurting economic growth," Mr. Geithner said during an interview with The Wall Street Journal in his U.S. Treasury office, citing the example of countries who "shift too quickly to premature restraint" after a crisis, including the U.S. in the 1930s. MORE...

"The Frustration of an Obama Supporter (Part 2: Hamstrung by Reality)"

The Rude Pundit:
This is where we are in our political spectrum: yesterday in Cleveland, President Barack Obama, a noted Kenyan socialist who pals around with terrorists, gave a speech that, in its core proposals, could have pretty much been given by Ronald Reagan. Yet it's still considered to be wild and woolly radicalism by the American right wing. And it's considered a barn-burning attack on Republicans by the left.

This is our current desperation, for Obama's failure on the right, for his success on the left, both sides needing their world views validated. The Rude Pundit is not immune to this. His feeling while watching much of Obama's speech was "Yeah, shove a fist right between John Boehner's charred carrot ass cheeks." Obama delivered punch after punch, mocking, for instance, the idea that millionaires should get hundreds of thousands of dollars in tax breaks. Fuck, yeah.

It was all class warfare-sounding, with exhortations to bringing back the middle class and angry denunciations of the Republicans' ability to run the fiscal policies of the nation. The speech really was a beautifully enraged, yet carefullly modulated, summation of where we are and how we got here. If it had been FDR or LBJ making it, that would have been followed by an announcement of some momentous program that would be directly transformative for vast numbers of the underclasses in America.
(SNIP)
Many are gonna read this as criticism. But it's not. It's recognition of the political and economic reality. George W. Bush murdered the possibility of government enacting sweeping programs in this country for at least another decade, if not a generation. He did it with his wars, with his tax cuts, and with his rhetoric: he planted the seeds of current GOP intransigence. Republicans went for nearly five years, passing whatever the hell the President wanted, but faced with actually having to negotiate with Democrats, the GOP decided to honor Bush by blocking Obama.
(SNIP)
So, for the Rude Pundit, the most encouraging part of yesterday's Cleveland speech wasn't the game of tax cut chicken that the President is playing with Republicans. It was that Obama owned his accomplishments. He didn't apologize for them. He said, "That’s why I kept my campaign promise and gave a middle-class tax cut to 95 percent of working Americans. That’s why we passed health insurance reform that stops insurance companies from jacking up your premiums at will or denying coverage because you get sick. That’s why we passed financial reform that will end taxpayer-funded bailouts; reform that will stop credit card companies and mortgage lenders from taking advantage of taxpayers and consumers." And while he didn't use the dreaded word "stimulus," he did own his economic plan. He said, in essence, "Yeah, that's me jacking off in that video. Look how good I stroke my dick. Jealous?"

Democrats, including Obama, have allowed the GOP to set the terms of every argument. Yesterday, Obama explicitly threw the shackles of bipartisanship back at the Republicans. In doing so, he joined the fight to save a Democratic Congress. You don't go back to trying to play nice with the other side once you've called them motherfuckers because they fuck their mothers.

No, there wasn't much meat there for progressives, but there were plenty of side dishes. For now, for the realistic Obama supporter, the one who knew who he was voting for all along, that will have to suffice. MORE...

"Dylan Rhatigan on marijuana legalization in California" (video)


MSNBC-Dylan Rhatigan, video (05:26).

"Dhaka: fastest growing megacity in the world" (with video)

globalpost,with video (scroll down--07:29):
DHAKA, Bangladesh — The future is here, and it smells like burning trash.

As the evening call to prayer echoes across Dhaka’s teeming slums, a bluish haze rises in the murky air. Cooking happens mostly on open fires in the shantytowns of the Bangladeshi capital, the flames kindled with paper, scavenged lumber and bits of plastic junk.

On a recent evening in a broken labyrinth of shacks called the Korail slum, a wiry young mother in a red sari stooped to light the clay hearth outside her family’s one-room home. Mina, 24, touched her match to a castoff vinyl folder, three-hole-punched for documents she’ll never read.

“I don’t like to live in Dhaka,” she said, fanning the smoking plastic, then laying splintered bamboo on top. “But we have a dream to buy a piece of land, some land back in our village.”

Mina, who uses only one name, followed her husband here in 2009 — joining the nearly half-million migrants who pour into Dhaka each year. It’s not clear how soon, if ever, they’ll leave. Mina’s husband saves only a few dollars each month from his job selling fish. Mina, meanwhile, cares for their two children and, like millions of other women here, fires up the family’s nightly meal.

The smoke from these fires signals not a return to a prior age but, rather, the dawn of something new. Depending on how one measures, the planet now boasts 20 or so megacities — urban agglomerations where the United Nations estimates [3] the population has reached 10 million or more. The world’s rapid urbanization is a reality fraught with both peril and hope. The peril is obvious. Overcrowding, pollution, poverty, impossible demands for energy and water all result in an overwhelming sense these megacities will simply collapse. But the hope, while less obvious, needs more attention. The potential efficiencies of urban living, the access to health care and jobs, along with plummeting urban birth rates have all convinced some environmental theorists the migration to cities may in fact save the planet. But only, these experts hasten to add, if this shift is well managed.

Among these megacities, The World Bank says Dhaka, with its current population of 15 million people, bears the distinction of being the fastest-growing in the world [4]. Between 1990 and 2005, the city doubled in size — from 6 to 12 million. By 2025, the U.N. predicts Dhaka will be home to more than 20 million people — larger than Mexico City, Beijing or Shanghai. MORE...

Hertzberg: "Move the Mosque!"

Hendrik Hertzberg:
Fortuitously, there exists one location that would be ideal for the so-called “Ground Zero mosque.” That location would be . . . Ground Zero.

The principal goals of the 9/11 attacks were to ignite a civilizational war between Islam and the West, especially America; to marginalize moderate Muslims and strengthen violent Islamists; to expose American religious tolerance and pluralism as a sham; and to recruit young Muslims to the most brutal, retrograde, reactionary form of jihad.

The principal goals of Cordoba House, as outlined by Feisal Abdul Rauf in the Times, are to promote “recognition of the rights of others, tolerance and freedom of worship”; to facilitate “building bridges between religious groups”; “to strengthen relations between the Western and Muslim worlds”; “to help counter radical ideology”; to serve as “a center for unification and healing”; and to undermine “the ability of anti-American radicals to recruit young, impressionable Muslims by falsely claiming that America persecutes Muslims for their faith.”

It would be hard to imagine a more powerful, pointed, passionate rebuke to Al Qaeda’s brand of twisted Islamism than for an open-hearted cultural and religious institution representing the tolerant, democratic Muslims of New York to be part of the risen World Trade Center.

Also, we could use the company, and the building could use another non-governmental tenant.

(I’d propose a similar plan for Al Qaeda’s other 9/11 target, except that the Pentagon already has a place for Muslims to pray. It opened a year and a month after the attacks.) MORE...
Howie P.S.: Every few years my former middle school pal (Hertzberg) and I are on the same page, poltically. The rest of the time I just admire his writing ability and his resume.

Andrew Weil: "Cannabis Rx: Cutting Through the Misinformation"

Andrew Weil:
If an American doctor of the late 19th century stepped into a time warp and emerged in 2010, he would be shocked by the multitude of pharmaceuticals that today's physicians use. But as he pondered this array (and wondered, as I do, whether most are really necessary), he would soon notice an equally surprising omission, and exclaim, "Where's my Cannabis indica?"

No wonder -- the poor fellow would feel nearly helpless without it. In his day, labor pains, asthma, nervous disorders and even colicky babies were treated with a fluid extract of Cannabis indica, also known as "Indian hemp." (Cannabis is generally seen as having three species -- sativa, indica and ruderalis -- but crossbreeding is common, especially between sativa and indica.) At least 100 scientific papers published in the 19th century backed up such uses.

Then the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 made possession or transfer of Cannabis illegal in the U.S. except for certain medical and industrial uses, which were heavily taxed. The legislation began a long process of making Cannabis use illegal altogether. Many historians have examined this sorry chapter in American legislative history, and the dubious evidence for Cannabis addiction and violent behavior used to secure the bill's passage. "Under the Influence: The Disinformation Guide to Drugs" by Preston Peet makes a persuasive case that the Act's real purpose was to quash the hemp industry, making synthetic fibers more valuable for industrialists who owned the patents.

Meanwhile, as a medical doctor and botanist, my aim has always been to filter out the cultural noise surrounding the genus Cannabis and see it dispassionately: as a plant with bioactivity in human beings that may have therapeutic value. From this perspective, what can it offer us?

As it turns out, a great deal. Research into possible medical uses of Cannabis is enjoying a renaissance. In recent years, studies have shown potential for treating nausea, vomiting, premenstrual syndrome, insomnia, migraines, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries, alcohol abuse, collagen-induced arthritis, asthma, atherosclerosis, bipolar disorder, depression, Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, sickle-cell disease, sleep apnea, Alzheimer's disease and anorexia nervosa.

But perhaps most exciting, cannabinoids (chemical constituents of Cannabis, the best known being tetrahydrocannabinol or THC) may have a primary role in cancer treatment and prevention. MORE...

Seattle Storm: BRING IT!!

"Seattle Storm WNBA Finals Game Day: Game 1 Dream At Storm (ABC, Noon)"---(SeattleSBNation.com):
After the Atlanta Dream beat the New York Liberty, a friend asked, “Would it be a disaster if this year’s WNBA Finals was boring after last season’s got so much attention as the best ever?”

With the Seattle Storm being so dominant all year long, it was somewhat difficult to imagine that the Dream could really contend with them. Moreover, given the Dream’s gritty style of play – predicated quite a bit on energy and scrappiness during the regular season – it definitely seemed like this would be series not made for television, Angel McCoughtry’s 42 points aside.

“Well it’s gonna be a battle of wills – who can impose their will, who can be the hungrier of the two teams and get the ball in their possession,” said Storm assistant coach Nancy Darsch. “It’s not gonna be pretty basketball all the time, but that’s the way it is in the playoffs: it’s a battle.” MORE...

The Day After: Maddow on "Exploiting 9/11 for fear and profit" (video)


MSNBC-Maddow, video (10:00).

Howie P.S.: Who is Newt's new friend?

Autumn in Seattle (photo)

This photo was taken along Lake Washington by Pam Eakes.

Eric Alterman: "Money Well Spent" (Charles and David Koch)

Eric Alterman (The Nation):
Jane Mayer's New Yorker profile of Charles and David Koch reveals a decades-long investment of many hundreds of millions of dollars to achieve a single goal. The billionaire oilmen sought to "bring about social change" to advance what Charles Koch calls their "radical philosophy." To make this happen, they've adopted a "vertically and horizontally integrated" strategy "from idea creation to policy development to education to grassroots organizations to lobbying to litigation to political action."
(SNIP)
The primary obstacle Powell identified was not the remnants of the late-'60s antiwar and civil rights movements, which were both in the process of disintegration. Rather, they sought to undermine the "respectable elements of society" and replace them with people like themselves.
(SNIP)
The Kochs, after all, do not fund much media. Rather, they fund the politicians, "experts" and (frequently phony) citizen leaders who create the context for the content of media debate. And perhaps their greatest success has been their ability to turn the establishment media into the credulous carrier of the constant stream of propaganda their grantees have become so adept at producing. MORE...

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Cenk Uygur: "Why Rahm Emanuel's Political Calculations Were 100% Wrong"

Cenk Uygur:
The Rahm Emanuel strategy was to cut deals with power brokers in Washington and ignore what liberals wanted. This was best illustrated when he called liberals "fucking retarded" for trying to push for real change. His attitude was that you could ignore progressive demands because - where could they go?!

Well, it turns out that the answer to that question is - home. MORE...

Greenwald: "Amazingly prescient/smart 9/12/2001 column from Hunter Thompson"

Glenn Greenwald:
It will be a Religious War, a sort of Christian Jihad, fueled by religious hatred and led by merciless fanatics on both sides. It will be guerilla warfare on a global scale, with no front lines and no identifiable enemy. Osama bin Laden may be a primitive "figurehead" -- or even dead, for all we know -- but whoever put those All-American jet planes loaded with All-American fuel into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon did it with chilling precision and accuracy. The second one was a dead-on bullseye. Straight into the middle of the skyscraper.

Nothing -- even George Bush's $350 billion "Star Wars" missile defense system -- could have prevented Tuesday's attack, and it cost next to nothing to pull off. Fewer than 20 unarmed Suicide soldiers from some apparently primitive country somewhere on the other side of the world took out the World Trade Center and half the Pentagon with three quick and costless strikes on one day. The efficiency of it was terrifying.

We are going to punish somebody for this attack, but just who or what will be blown to smithereens for it is hard to say. Maybe Afghanistan, maybe Pakistan or Iraq, or possibly all three at once. Who knows? Not even the Generals in what remains of the Pentagon or the New York papers calling for WAR seem to know who did it or where to look for them. MORE...

Bob Herbert on why "The Democrats are in deep, deep trouble"

Bob Herbert:
The Democrats are in deep, deep trouble because they have not effectively addressed the overwhelming concern of working men and women: an economy that is too weak to provide the jobs they need to support themselves and their families. And that failure is rooted in the Democrats’ continued fascination with the self-serving conservative belief that the way to help ordinary people is to shower money on the rich and wait for the blessings to trickle down to the great unwashed below. MORE...

Greenwald: "....here's Obama's genuinely impressive Press Conference answer about mosques and Muslims:" (video)


Glenn Greenwald points to this answer from yesterday's press conference, video (07:14).

Analysis: "Obama makes tax cuts a centerpiece of campaign"

Reuters:
President Barack Obama dared Republicans on Friday to wage an election campaign on tax cuts, telling voters his opponents are the party of the rich and all but ruling out a compromise before November elections.

In a rare news conference, Obama opened the door to negotiation with Republicans over tax cuts but then abruptly slammed it shut and went on the offensive to convince Americans that his opponents have no new ideas and are holding the economic recovery hostage over politics.

Here are some key interpretations of Obama's comments. MORE...

Friday, September 10, 2010

"Why Millions March in France, But Not in the US"

Rick Wolff:
There is a basic lesson in all this for the US left. It concerns why millions march there but not (yet?) here. The failure to develop, support, and widely disseminate anti-capitalist criticism and proposals for non-capitalist alternatives undermines the capacity for mass mobilizations to protect and advance working people's interests, especially in times of crisis. Even to make a political difference on so limited an issue as changing the age of retirement, effective mobilization of workers requires that they understand that issue in a much broader framework. Workers who see themselves in a broad social struggle for justice and for basic social change toward a better society can also then grasp and act on a particular issue with a sense of its historic meaning and implications. MORE...
Howie P.S.: What he's talking about is referred to as "the broader story line" or "narrative" in contemporary political jargon although he is proposing a specific theme..

Digby on the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy: "Constituent Service"

Digby:
"The people who own the country ought to govern it" John Jay
According to the polls, a majority of the American people are in favor of letting the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy expire. Obviously, the Republicans are not in favor of this. But Greg Sargent reports that increasing numbers of Democrats are coming out against it too.

I think that may be the saddest comment on Democratic Party failure yet, even including the advancement of the Cheney torture regime. Not because it's worse morally, but because the opportunity to educate people and obtain their support for progressive economics was practically laid at their feet and they whiffed.

But then, big Democratic donors don't want their taxes raised either, I suppose.

I'll just quote this excellent post by Kevin Drum again (click the link for the data points that back up his conclusion) and move on:
If your income is low — and probably a fair number of the 56% who want Bush's tax cuts for the rich repealed are low-income voters — politicians simply don't care. If you're middle class they care a little more. But if you're rich, then they really, really care. And it's safe to say that most high earners are opposed to repealing tax cuts on high earners. That goes for all Republicans and a growing number of Democrats too. So what seems like a no-brainer isn't as simple as it looks. Economically it makes sense to repeal Bush's tax cuts for the rich, and a majority of American citizens are in favor of it. Unfortunately for them, they belong to the wrong majority. They're not rich themselves, and increasingly in America, that means their votes just don't count.
Howie P.S.: Here's hoping Obama follows Joe Conason's advice today and stands up for his "base" at his press conference. And more advice for Obama from Brent Budowsky: "If Obama names Elizabeth Warren, the Democratic base erupts like a volcano and votes." I'm not sure about the volcano, but it wouldn't hurt.

Thursday, September 09, 2010

"Dean, Dingell, others rally campus crowd to turn out for Dems in midterm"

The Michigan Daily:
Dean, a past Democratic National Committee chairman and former Vermont governor, said Obama stands for the values that many college students believe in — equal rights and opportunities — and added that if Republicans assume majority control in Congress, America will be “starkly different” and regress to days of intolerance.

“I remember what it was like to see the dogs loosed on people, who simply were crossing over into a different colored neighborhood to vote,” Dean said. “I remember what it was like to see the police turning fire hoses on peaceful demonstrators. We are not going back.”

Dean said if Democrats truly want change, they must work not only toward getting their candidates elected but also to inspire Democratic sentiment throughout the nation and to work tirelessly to make their desires heard.

“So many Americans think all we have to do is vote and get our guy in, or our women in, and then they’re going to do the work and we’re going to go back to whatever we were doing before,” Dean said. “It doesn’t work like that. If you want your country to work, you have to work every single day.”

Although voters will not be electing the next U.S. president, Dean said the upcoming elections are just as pivotal, because President Obama will need in November's elections Congressional support to continue to accomplish policy initiatives.

“Barack Obama is not on the ballot this time, but he is in many ways,” Dean said. “He can’t get anything done, unless you send these guys back to Congress.” MORE...

Bi-partisanship comes back from the dead: "Republican Voinovich of Ohio to back small-business incentives in Senate bill"

WaPo:
Retiring Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) said he plans to help push a package of small-business incentives through the Senate next week, a move that would give President Obama and congressional Democrats a key victory on the economy in the final weeks before the November midterm elections.

In an interview, Voinovich said he could no longer support Republican efforts to delay the measure in hopes of winning the right to offer additional amendments. Most of the proposed GOP amendments "didn't have anything to do with the bill" anyway, Voinovich said, and amounted merely to partisan "messaging."

"We don't have time for messaging," Voinovich said. "We don't have time anymore. This country is really hurting." MORE...

Billy Bragg @Bumbershoot on Obama, America, showbiz, the internet, etc. (video)


The Marty Riemer Show, video (10:20):
Marty and Jodi hang out with Billy backstage.
H/t to my neighbor Heidi Shininger-Forrer.

Ari Melber: "DNC Slams Journalist and Trippi Over Midterms Article"

Ari Melber (The Nation):
Campaigns often heat up after Labor Day, and a fighting spirit has clearly taken hold at the DNC, which launched an unusual defense of its mid-terms strategy on Thursday evening.

Organizing for America (OFA), the field arm of the Obama campaign that was rolled into the DNC, released a lacing rebuttal to a new Time article reporting that OFA had become a shrunken "ghost of its former self." The article depicted OFA as an operation abandoned by voters and donors alike, while airing anonymous suggestions that campaign guru David Plouffe was sereptitiously using national funds to "rebuild an army for 2012 under the cover of boosting turnout in 2010." (Plouffe "strongly" denied the charge within the article.) Time added geographic fuel to the fire, too, reporting, "OFA is putting staff into such states as Virginia, North Carolina and Arizona, which have few close statewide races this fall but which are all prime targets in an Obama re-election campaign."

At 5pm Thursday, OFA posted an official response [1] on the DNC website and circulated the text to reporters. Like the White House, OFA rarely publicizes written rebuttals to specific articles -- that would be a full-time job when the subject is the President -- and the reply was also striking for its heated tone. Blasting Time's Jay Newton-Small as "a misinformed journalist" who did "poor reporting" with a "total aversion to the facts," OFA spokesman Lynda Tran hammered Newton-Small for relying on clueless or anonymous sources, and "falsely claiming that OFA is exclusively focused on turning out 'surge' voters."
(SNIP)
All told, the 850-word rebuttal was more than double the length of the original article.

Time obviously struck a nerve. But the strong response is strategically odd -- a short piece in the print edition of the magazine is unlikely to rock Washington, while the DNC reaction gives it legs. Before, most of the (few) links to the piece were by conservative bloggers, not a very vital or persuadable constitutency for OFA. Then DNC officials began sounding off, and the item got picked up in Politico (and The Nation). Ben Smith, a widely read Politico blogger, headlined a Thursday afternoon post [2] on the dust-up, "DNC goes nuclear on Time, Cook for Ofa critique." Smith's tweet on the kerfuffle was even crisper:

"OfA incredibly defensive."

Chuck Todd, the NBC News White House correspondent who regularly deals with top Obama aides, tweeted [3] in response to this Nation piece that DNC officials are "super-sensitive on proving OFA was a good idea." I also asked Time for its response to the response, and spokesman Daniel Kile emailed that the magazine “stands by the story and Jay Newton-Small’s reporting.”

Finally, on a personal note, I spent plenty of time on OFA while researching and writing a 74-page report [4] about the organization's first year. The touchy and sometimes combative stance towards independent reporting on display here is familiar -- for a new school organization, OFA is pretty old school when it comes to transparency and dealing with hard questions from reporters and constituents. (I discuss its work and potential reforms at length in the report, so I won't rehash those points here.)

Beyond the press, though, the core argument of the Time article seems off. The height of the 2008 campaign is not a logical or fair baseline for assessing participation in the off-season, and OFA has undoubtedly engaged supporters around the country with social, political and service activities, both online and off. (See the broad data above, or more granular indicators in my report.) While politicos gush about how a President can benefit from a mediocre midterm showing, the article offered no reason how such cyclical electoral politics relate to organizing, where relationships and long-term momentum are key. So I don't see any tension between a strong turnout in the midterms and a strong turnout in 2012 -- this is an area where the Plouffe/Stewart/Bird agenda for Obama activists is naturally in line with the Barack/Rahm ambition for a second term. MORE...
Howie P.S.: Rahm? But I thought he was headed back to Chicago.

Obama on GMA (video and transcript)


ABCNews, video (03:14) and full transcript.

"Obama raises stakes and redefines debate for the midterm election" (with video)

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Tim Kaine
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical HumorTea Party

E.J. Dionne:
Until Obama's Labor Day speech in Milwaukee and his statement of principles Wednesday near Cleveland, it was not clear how much heart he had in the fight or whether he would ever offer a comprehensive argument for the advantage of his party's approach.

In the absence of a coherent case, Republicans were winning by default on a wave of protest votes. Without this new effort at self-definition, Obama was a blur: a socialist to conservatives, a sellout to some progressives, and a disappointment to younger Americans who wondered what happened to the ebullient, hopeful guy they voted for.

That's why the Milwaukee-Cleveland one-two punch mattered. The first speech showed Obama could fight and enjoy himself in the process. The second speech spelled out why he has chosen to do battle. MORE...

Howie P.S.: Tim Kaine visits Jon Stewart, video (07:32), who isn't buying the new Democratic happy-talk.

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

Joan Walsh: "The White House after Rahm?" (with video)

Joan Walsh (Salon) with video (07:19) from MSNBC's "Hardball":
I don't think the Obama presidency hinges on whether chief of staff Rahm Emanuel stays or goes. I'm much more interested in the calculation behind the president's recent decision to get tough on Republicans. I loved his Labor Day speech, I was thrilled he committed yesterday to letting the Bush tax cuts expire for the richest 2 percent of Americans, and I'm surprised but pleased he's taking on not only the GOP, but wannabe GOP House Speaker John Boehner in his speech today. MORE...

Bill Gates Sr: "Love This State" --Yes on 1098 (video)


Yes on 1098, video (00:30):
Yes on 1098 campaign TV spot, in which Bill Gates Sr. describes why he helped create Initiative 1098: Washington's middle-class families are struggling and the wealthiest need to start paying their share.

Michael Moore Sends His Best Wishes to Rahmbo: "Happy Fuckin' Labor Day!"

Michael Moore:
Dear Rahm Emanuel:

Happy Fuckin' Labor Day! I read this week that — according to a new book by Steven Rattner, your administration's former "Car Czar" — during White House meetings about how to save the tens of thousands of jobs that would be lost if GM and Chrysler collapsed, your response was, "Fuck the UAW!"

Now, I can't believe you actually said that. Maybe Rattner got confused because you drop a lot of F-bombs, or maybe your assistant was trying to order lunch and you said (to Rattner) "Fuck you" and then to your assistant "A&W, no fries."

Or maybe you did mean Fuck the UAW. If so, let me give you a little fucking lesson (a lesson I happen to know because my fucking uncle was in the sit-down strike that founded the fucking UAW).

Before there were unions, there was no middle class. Working people didn't get to send their kids to college, few were able to own their own fucking home, nobody could take a fucking day off for a funeral or a sick day or they might lose their fucking job. MORE...

"GOP Tsunami Warning? Democrats and Republicans Now Tied in Generic Tracking Poll" (with video)


Heather (Crooks and Liars) with video (05:26):
Ed Schultz and Joan Walsh discuss the upcoming mid-term elections and this constant drumbeat we're hearing about how the Republicans are going to have a "GOP tsunami" this time around and regain the House and possibly the Senate. As Joan noted, these national polls that are being made so much of are all over the place and it might be a little bit early to put too much stock in them and as she also noted that generic poll that showed the Republicans up by ten points last week now shows them tied again. MORE...

"President Promises Business Tax Breaks" in Ohio (video)


C-SPAN, with video (47:49):
President Obama layed out his plan for stimulating the national economy and job creation in Cleveland today. He discussed extending tax cuts for the middle class, and announced new policies for businesses to write off the purchase of new equipment.

In his speech, the President said he will extend Bush-era tax cuts for those making making $250,000 or less. He also said that for any income over this amount, "the tax rates would go back to what they were under President Clinton."

President Obama will continue to discuss the economy and jobs on Friday when he holds a White House news conference to outline additional efforts to help revive the economy.

Can Obama Make a Fourth Quarter Bounce Back (like the Seattle Storm)?

Greg Sargent, assessing the prospects for a fourth quarter Democratic rebound:
So here's the question about this: Are we now going to see eight weeks of aggressive populism from the White House, and will it enable Dems to re-nationalize the elections on their own terms? MORE...
"Is a White House Shakeup Ahead?" (Richard Wolfe):
Democrats are facing the prospect of a Republican tidal wave, as unemployment inches up and President Obama’s approval ratings tumble down. As the fall campaign heats up in earnest, Obama needs his political team to blot out distractions as they focus on the daunting challenge of trying to retain control of the House and Senate. MORE...
Obama won't back Bush tax cut extension for rich (Salon):
The president is set to pick a fight with the GOP and conservative members of his own party MORE...

Robert Scheer, Robert Reich and Bill Boyarsky: Progressives Push Back on Obama (with video)

"Robert Scheer on The Great American Stickup: How Reagan Republicans and Clinton Democrats Enriched Wall Street While Mugging Main Street" (Democracy Now! video-16:00).

"It’s the Mortgages, Stupid" (Robert Scheer-truthdig):
This week’s proposals by the Obama administration to deal with the persistent economic crisis will be, as with previous plans that involved trillions of taxpayer dollars, little more than salt in the wounds. Once again the strategy is to stimulate the economy by funding projects and tax cuts while ignoring the root cause of the problem: a housing foreclosure meltdown that has chilled the spending of a majority of American consumers. MORE...
Howie P.S.: Is Elizabeth Warren the progressive ally that is needed? Answer: Elizabeth Warren @Netroots Nation, video (12:00). Robert Reich writes "Why Obama Is Proposing Whopping Corporate Tax Cuts, and Why He’s Wrong." Bill Boyarsky's "Democrats on the Edge of a Midterm Disaster" puts the Obama administration at the center of the problem:
The nation’s problems—war and unemployment—are badly damaging the Democrats, even on the Pacific Coast, which President Barack Obama won easily in 2008. And Obama himself, reacting slowly and indecisively, is contributing to the challenges his party faces in November. MORE...

Tuesday, September 07, 2010

Greg Sargent's "Happy Hour Roundup" and "David Plouffe Campaign Update: Sept 7, 2010" (with video)


BarackObamadotcom, video (03:42):
David Plouffe recorded a campaign update at OFA HQ to illustrate what supporters helped build -- and to show why we think the pundits are missing a key part of the story of 2010.
Howie P.S.: Plouffe's pep talk goes well with Greg Sargent's "Happy Hour Roundup." It contains some hopeful news for the Democrats and I'm including the last item concerning Rahmbo is this category:
* The White House pushback continues as Rahm Emanuel claims President Obama's new infrastructure spending and business tax break proposals will enable him to "seize the economic initiative."

* And: Robert Gibbs responds to all the bleak polling by acknowledging voter concern about the economy but asserting that "by virtually any measure our economy is in a better place than it was two years ago.".

* Gallup counters the conventional wisdom, finding the two parties are tied in the generic Congressional matchup after Republicans had been leading. Wonder if this will get lots of attention, too...

* And the DCCC pushes back, releasing a raft of internal polls showing Dems ahead in some very difficult races.

* Nate Silver skewers the myth that Dem candidates are uniformly running away from health care reform, though the picture is complex.

* Ben Smith says Richard Daley's decision not to seek re-election as Chicago mayor gives Rahm an exit strategy and a chance at redemption after a midterm wipeout.

* And it looks like Emanuel is really considering it.

Fifth Annual Seattle Progressive Talk AM1090 Forum (with video and audio)

KPTK with video (60:00)and audio:
Thanks again to our Moderator David Postman and Stephanie Miller, Thom Hartmann, Norman Goldman, Randi Rhodes, Mike Malloy, special guest Ron Reagan, and to the many fans of AM 1090 for attending.
Howie P.S.: The most interesting comments for me came near the end as the talkers discussed their feelings about Obama's first 19 months in office.

Ed Schultz Announces October 2nd “One Nation Working Together” Washington March (with video)


PoliticsNewsNews, with video (13:42):
Friday night (September 3) on “The Ed Show” on MSNBC, progressive talk show host Ed Shultz laid down a challenge for Americans to put aside their differences and come together. for what is truly needed and important in our country at this time: more jobs so that every person in America who wants to work can get a job and be able to support his or her family now and into the future. Schultz announced that he is joining the One Nation Working Together movement and will be a featured speaker at the October 2 One Nation Working Together march in Washington.

He proclaimed: “This is about now and this is about jobs. Labor has been under attack for the last thirty years. It is my motivation to be a part of this and to motivate the audience of this television show to get on this platform; to be a part of this march on Washington on October 2nd.”

Too many of our fellow citizens are hungry, homeless and hopeless in this country. And instead of indulging in the politics of fear and isolation that seem to dominate, we are coming together to work as one toward concrete goals that bring justice to our communities.

Let us hear your dreams for America. Register for the October 2 march today.

Howie P.S.: Full mission statement and more details here.

Krugman on Obama's New "Infrastructure" Proposal

Paul Krugman:
Some bleary-eyed thoughts from Japan on the reported administration proposal for $50 billion in new spending:

1. It’s a good idea
2. It’s much too small
3. It won’t pass anyway — which makes you wonder why the administration didn’t propose a bigger plan, so as to at least make the point that the other party is standing in the way of much needed repair to our roads, ports, sewers, and more– not to mention creating jobs. Once again, they’re striking right at the capillaries. MORE...
Howie P.S.: Anticipate more "infrastructure" talk (in the $200 billion range) from Obama Wednesday in Cleveland.

Monday, September 06, 2010

"The true cost of the Iraq war: $3 trillion and beyond"

Joseph E. Stiglitz and Linda J. Bilmes (WaPo, op-ed):
Writing in these pages in early 2008, we put the total cost to the United States of the Iraq war at $3 trillion. This price tag dwarfed previous estimates, including the Bush administration's 2003 projections of a $50 billion to $60 billion war.

But today, as the United States ends combat in Iraq, it appears that our $3 trillion estimate (which accounted for both government expenses and the war's broader impact on the U.S. economy) was, if anything, too low. For example, the cost of diagnosing, treating and compensating disabled veterans has proved higher than we expected.

Moreover, two years on, it has become clear to us that our estimate did not capture what may have been the conflict's most sobering expenses: those in the category of "might have beens," or what economists call opportunity costs. For instance, many have wondered aloud whether, absent the Iraq invasion, we would still be stuck in Afghanistan. And this is not the only "what if" worth contemplating. We might also ask: If not for the war in Iraq, would oil prices have risen so rapidly? Would the federal debt be so high? Would the economic crisis have been so severe?

The answer to all four of these questions is probably no. The central lesson of economics is that resources -- including both money and attention -- are scarce. What was devoted to one theater, Iraq, was not available elsewhere. MORE...

Howie P.S.: H/t to Darryl. Like Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz is a recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. Another "cost" of the Iraq war that gets insufficient attention:
"Documented civilian deaths from violence: 97,667 - 106,571"
(Iraq Body Count).

Updated: Obama Gives Barn Burner In Milwaukee: "They treat me like a dog" (video)

Update: "Going Bigger: Pres. Obama to propose investing $200B via tax incentives to reinvigorate the economy" (Wall Street Journal). H/t to Rob Glaser.


UpTakeVideo, video (39:35):
President Obama speaks to a union audience at Laborfest in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on Labor Day. He recalls the wonderful things unions have brought to working Americans including the 40 hour work week, vacations and other benefits. He then criticizes Senate Republicans for consistently blocking anything he tries to do. "If I said the sky is blue, they'd say no. If I said fish live in the sea, they'd say no." said the President.
Howie P.S.: H/t to Washington Dems. Robert Becker frets about "The Obama Tragedy: No Narrative." Does this Labor Day speech answer Becker's question: "Does No-Drama Mean No Storyline?" Michael Moore wishes Rahmbo "Happy Fuckin' Labor Day!"

Krugman: "1938 in 2010"

1938 Buick Coupe

Paul Krugman:
Now, we weren’t supposed to find ourselves replaying the late 1930s. President Obama’s economists promised not to repeat the mistakes of 1937, when F.D.R. pulled back fiscal stimulus too soon. But by making his program too small and too short-lived, Mr. Obama did just that: the stimulus raised growth while it lasted, but it made only a small dent in unemployment — and now it’s fading out.

And just as some of us feared, the inadequacy of the administration’s initial economic plan has landed it — and the nation — in a political trap. More stimulus is desperately needed, but in the public’s eyes the failure of the initial program to deliver a convincing recovery has discredited government action to create jobs.

In short, welcome to 1938. MORE...
Howie P.S.: Who was it that said “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it”?

Sunday, September 05, 2010

ACLU of WA Public Forum: "Where is Marijuana Reform Heading?"

ACLU of Washington:
DATE: Sunday, September 12, 2010, 7:00 pm - 9:00pm (Doors open at 6:30 pm)

LOCATION: Great Hall at Town Hall Seattle, 1119 8th Avenue at Seneca Street. Enter on 8th Avenue. (Directions and Parking)

The ACLU-WA presents a discussion on the history, current status, and future of marijuana-law reform in Washington and the United States. Local and national panelists include travel writer Rick Steves; Keith Stroup, founder of, and legal counsel to, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws; Washington state Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles; Rob Kampia, co-founder and executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project; and Ethan Nadelmann, founder and executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. Moderated by ACLU-WA Drug Policy Director Alison Holcomb.

Free and open to the public. This is not a ticketed event. Admission is on a first-come, first-served basis.

Frank Rich on Obama's "bloodless speech on Tuesday night"

Frank Rich:
Even now those think-tank types who kept seeing light at the end of the Iraqi tunnel are ubiquitous on television and op-ed pages making similar stay-the-course prognostications about Afghanistan. Their embarrassing track records may have temporarily vanished into the great American memory hole, but actions do have consequences, and there must be an accounting. America does have a soul, and, as Franzen so powerfully dramatizes in “Freedom,” when that soul is violated, we are paralyzed until we set it right.

And yet here we are, slouching toward yet another 9/11 anniversary, still waiting for a correction, with even our president, an eloquent Iraq war opponent, slipping into denial. Of all the pro forma passages in Obama’s speech, perhaps the most jarring was his entreaty that Iraq’s leaders “move forward with a sense of urgency to form an inclusive government that is just, representative and accountable.” He might as well have been talking about the poisonous political deadlock in Washington. At that moment, there was no escaping the tragic fact that instead of bringing American-style democracy and freedom to Iraq, the costly war we fought there has, if anything, brought the bitter taste of Iraq’s dysfunction to America. MORE...
Howie P.S.: There's alot more powerful prose where the blurb above comes from.

Emery's prosecutor: "Our marijuana policy is dangerous and wrong and should be changed"

John McKay (Seattle Times op-ed):
As Emery's prosecutor and a former federal law-enforcement official, however, I'm not afraid to say out loud what most of my former colleagues know is true: Our marijuana policy is dangerous and wrong and should be changed through the legislative process to better protect the public safety. MORE...

"What Britain could learn from Portugal's drugs policy"

A cannabis smoker in Porto, Portugal, during a march in favour of legalising drugs. Photograph: Estela Silva/EPA

GuardianUK:
A decade ago Portugal took a radical new approach to illegal drugs by treating users as people with social problems rather than as criminals. Could it work in the UK?---In the midst of the recently resurgent debate in Britain about whether our drug laws are working – or require a major overhaul – the experience of Portugal has become a crucial piece of evidence in favour of a radical approach that has confounded the expectations of even its conservative critics, so much so that in the last month British officials have asked their Portuguese counterparts for advice, with the only caveat being that they avoid mentioning the word "decriminalise".

It is, perhaps, an unnecessary sensitivity. For the reality is that, despite liberalising how it regards drug possession – now largely an administrative problem rather than a criminal offence – Portugal has not become a magnet for drug tourists like Amsterdam, as some had predicted. MORE...
Howie P.S.: H/t to Glenn Greenwald.

Labor Day Weekend in Seattle: Bumbershoot 2010 (slideshow)

Photo Gallery Day One (seattlepi.com).

Howie P.S.: I was there (just highlight memories) for Miles Davis in the late 20th century and the Marley sons more recently, Here's Patrick MacDonald's "30 of Bumbershoot Years" (Seattle Times, August 27,2000).

Saturday, September 04, 2010

Krugman on "Rahmism"

Paul Krugman:
Look: early on the administration had a political theory: it would win bipartisan legislative victories, and each success would make Republicans who voted no feel left out, so that they would vote for the next initiative, and so on. (By the way, read that article and weep: “The massive resistance Republicans posed to Clinton in 1993 is impossible to imagine today.” They really believed that.)

This theory led to a strategy of playing it safe: never put forward proposals that might fail to pass, avoid highlighting the philosophical differences between the parties. There was never an appreciation of the risks of having policies too weak to do the job.

And then it led the administration to keep claiming that the legislation it had gotten through was just right, long past the point when it was obvious that the policies were inadequate. MORE...

Howie P.S.: Howie Klein elaborates.

Joe Bageant on "the hallucination that is America" (with audio)

"Joe Bageant in conversation with Richard Fidler" (ABC-Brisbane, with audio-52:28):
America can look a bit bewildering today to outsiders - the richer states tend to vote for the Democrats and the poorer states for the Republicans who want tax cuts for the wealthy.

Joe Bageant can put forward more than a few reasons why the uneducated white Americans feel the way they do.
Howie P.S.: More Joe, interviewed in Australia on Radio New Zealand and ABC Northern Tasmania (scroll down).

Friday, September 03, 2010

"Spoiled Americans" or #NOT?

"Americans aren't 'spoiled,' they're angry about not having jobs" (Adam Serwer-The Plum Line):
Eugene Robinson's column about how the American people are "spoiled" ingrates unable to recognize all that's been done for them is comically ill-timed given today's dismal unemployment report, showing an economy unable to get moving:

In the punditry business, it's considered bad form to question the essential wisdom of the American people. But at this point, it's impossible to ignore the obvious: The American people are acting like a bunch of spoiled brats.

This is not, I repeat not, a partisan argument. My own political leanings are well-known, but the refusal of Americans to look seriously at the nation's situation -- and its prospects -- is an equal-opportunity scourge. Republicans got the back of the electorate's hand in 2006 and 2008; Democrats will feel the sting this November. By 2012, it will probably be the GOP's turn to get slapped around again.

It's bad form to call the American people "spoiled" because generally that's what pundits do when their side is losing. This column is no exception: Robinson laments the fact that "incredibly, according to Gallup, registered voters say they intend to vote for Republicans over Democrats by an astounding 10-point margin." MORE...

"Spoiled Voters, Real Americans" (Digby):
Adam Serwer correctly took issue with Eugene Robinson's assertion today that the American people are acting like spoiled brats. People are genuinely stressed and it's human nature to want to take it out on the government, which is the only institution in which the average person has a say. But I would take issue with one thing. Serwer writes this:
[I]t's silly to blame the American people for reacting to the results of Democratic governance. Unemployment edged up to 9.6 percent, the economy losing 54,000 jobs. As Neil Irwin reports today, "The current pace of job creation is too weak to put Americans back to work in significant numbers." There's no mystery as to why Americans aren't dancing in the streets. A better argument might be that Democrats are being "spoiled," since it's their lack of enthusiasm about voting that is giving the GOP a major advantage.
But, you know, Democrats are Americans too. And they are also without jobs (or unable to change them) and are losing their homes and savings in this economy. MORE...
Howie P.S.: 'Americans' (I'm referring to the middle class) are not essentially spoiled. They have been hung out to dry (roast) by a political shitstem in general and a Democratic leadership in particular that has abdicated the fight on behalf of their interests. Or to put it in crass political terms:
This is what happens when you abandon your base.

Obama's "Stimulus Lite"

HuffPo:
THIS (EARLY) MORNING'S FRONT PAGE HEADLINE: "White House Recovery Package Heavy On Business Tax Breaks, Jobs An Afterthought." The headline links to "White House considers pre-midterm package of business tax breaks to spur hiring" (WaPo).
Meanwhile, Krugman pleads for "bold and substantive" measures "since the Republicans will oppose him regardless."

Howie P.S.: Sorry, Paul.

Thursday, September 02, 2010

Obama's "Liberal overreach" or #NOT?

Adam Serwer of the American Prospect is guest blogging on The Plum Line:
"Liberal overreach" is a beltway rule of thumb, and in a country where more people identify as conservative than liberal, it's sure to be a crowd-pleaser. But that doesn't mean it's accurate. Liberals didn't "overreach;" they didn't reach far enough. They didn't reach far enough in part because they were unwilling or unable to counter silly beltway narratives of "liberal overreach" with empirical evidence. And now Democrats are paying the price, not just with Americans who are angry about the economy, but with their own frustrated, demoralized base. MORE...
Joe Trippi posts his "friend Pat Caddell’s take on the upcoming election":
Can Obama soften the blow at the eleventh hour? Caddell says it will be tough. Any efforts by Obama to right his ship, he says, will still face an electorate largely uninterested in new West Wing talking points or presidential maneuvers. Caddell believes that 2010 will be a louder, more raucous moment than 1978 in American politics. “The discontent is much larger than the turnout at Glenn Beck rallies,” he says. “A sea of anger is churning — the tea parties are but the tip of the iceberg. People say they want to take their country back, and, to the Democrats’ chagrin, they’re very serious about it.” MORE..
Howie P.S.: Trippi posting something about people who want "to take their country back" from the Democrats: oh, the irony!

"The first known medicinal marijuana advertisement to be aired on television." (with video)


StarcasmVideo (00:37):
This is the first known medicinal marijuana advertisement to be aired on television. Commercial provided by permission from CannaCare. This spot first ran on FOX 40 in Sacramento, California in August of 2010.
HuffPo:
Found via Time comes this commercial said to be the first ever for Medical Marijuana. Broadcast this week on Fox affiliate KTXL in Sacramento, the ad is for an area dispensary called CannaCare. Time notes:

Cannabis, now legal for medical use by prescription in 14 states, is used as an alternative to pain killers and because advertisement of prescription drugs is entirely legal, it could be tough for naysayers to push for the regulation of the broadcasts.

Medical Marijuana has become an increasingly contentious issue in California, even after its use was legalized by Proposition 215 in 1996. Recent months have seen a severe crackdown on dispensaries in Los Angeles stemming from new regulations limiting where shops can operate. Proposition 19, a November ballot initiative which would essentially legalize marijuana in the state, has a slim lead in polling but has high profile opposition from politicians including Jerry Brown and Dianne Feinstein.

Politico: "Senate control hinges on unlikely trio" (Boxer, Murray, Feingold)

Jonathan Martin (Politico):
Murray, like Feingold and Boxer, has had the good fortune to run in 1992 and 1998, election years that were good to Democrats nationally. In 2004, the Bush re-election campaign didn’t contest Washington state.

“Dino does not have anybody to drag him down this cycle,” said Washington GOP chairman Luke Esser, referring to Bush’s seven-point loss there in 2004.

Rossi said he could overcome the Democrats’ Puget Sound electoral lock because he hails from the Seattle area and actually held a state Senate seat in King County.

He also expressed confidence that Murray’s message that she has delivered for the state, in part thanks to her seat on the Appropriations Committee, would fare about as well when veteran Washington Democratic giants Sen. Warren Magnuson and House Speaker Tom Foley made the same pitch, respectively, in 1980 and 1994—both wave years for the GOP.

“This is probably not the year to be talking about pork,” said Rossi.

Murray backers note that the “mom in tennis shoes” has been underestimated in the past and never won by anything less than eight percent.

Already, the senator is on the state’s airwaves slamming Rossi for saying he opposed the new Wall Street regulations and Murray’s campaign is making the case that he’s less-than-pure on fiscal issues. MORE...

Wednesday, September 01, 2010

"A grim speech for a grim war" (with video)

Roger Simon (Politico):
In the trickiest part of his speech, Obama, having pivoted from war to the economy, tried to bundle them together. 

“As we wind down the war in Iraq, we must tackle those challenges at home with as much energy, and grit, and sense of common purpose as our men and women in uniform who have served abroad,” he said. “They have met every test that they faced. Now, it is our turn.”

But is our economy still teetering on the brink because ordinary Americans lack “energy,” “grit” and a “sense of common purpose”? Or is it because corporate fat cats and predatory lenders duped a nation while lining their parachutes with gold?

In speaking of our military, Obama said, “They stared into the darkest of human creations - - war - - and helped the Iraqi people seek the light of peace.”

Good. Now maybe we should send the troops to Wall Street and see what good they can do for our people. MORE...
Howie P.S.: Somebody should ask Gibbs if Simon is part of "the professional left"? Glenn Greenwald reacts to the speech on CBC, video (04:47).